3 Comments to '“You don’t have the right to challenge it”'
Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to '“You don’t have the right to challenge it”'.
:: Trackbacks/Pingbacks ::
No Trackbacks/Pingbacks
“You don’t have the right to challenge it”
Interesting confrontation at Louisiana State University. I find this dude’s reason to dismantle the pro-life (or anti-abortion, your pick) display very illuminating.
[h/t Michelle Malkin]
[cross-posted to PWPL]
May 7th, 2008
Very illuminating, indeed. He said, “In 1973, there was made a consitiutional right for a woman to be able to have an abortion…” He admits that the right was created in 1973. The implication is that it did not exist before 1973, which is correct. Personally, I’d like this moonbat to show me Constitutional Amendment and the stated that voted to ratify it.
Typical liberal BS. I notice several females re-setting the crosses. Must not be too upsetting for women, huh??
You have the right to challenge anything as long a you do it peacefully and lawfully. Saying something is a Supreme Court decision and you have no right to challenge the decision!!! – this guy goes to a University and he is actually this stupid??? Wright a paper or put up crosses, what is the difference? Are you crazy? I am perfectly ok with putting up crosses in front of someone that has had an abortion, maybe they will think about what they have done. If I could have my way (I realize I can’t) I would post the pictures of their personal abortions all over their dorm rooms. I have never seen such ignorance displayed by someone. The fact that the Supreme Court ruled it is ok to kill the unborn does not mean you cannot lawfully and peacefully protest the decision. The 2nd Amendment says I can own a gun, but I can point to hundreds of sign carrying protesters everytime the NRA holds a meeting. This is their right to peacefully protest the fact that I own a gun, it is their first amendment right. Putting up crosses is a non-violent way of protesting a supreme court decision. I heard a person’s voice in the film say that they had the Universities permission to put up the crosses, if so, the man tearing down the crosses was violating their right to free speach. He was wrong, the cop was weak. This guy really needs to read the constitution. You have to love liberalism – stupid is as stupid does.
Amazing. the scope of ignorance is absolutely amazing. The Supreme Court of the United States violated the constitution with this abortion disposition. The Supreme Court has not authority to make law in this country, that is a legislative action, which would fall to the purview of legislative bodies at the state and federal levels. The Supreme Court can not “give” any one any rights. Rights are endowed by the Creator-GOD-no one in this country has constitutional rights, we have GOD given rights, constitutionally protected. Life, Liberty,Pursuit of Happiness as stated in the Declaration of Independence and this is the founding document for the United States. I guess college education is wasted on this individual. If the right to Life is of no value, of what value is another other fight? This, the defending of killing little babies, is truly something worth doing in the land of the free. I guess now it is the land of the free if you can escape the womb of the ignorant.